Hi On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Mike Pinkerton wrote:
> > What I don't understand is the wisdom of an official Fedora "product" > endorsing a copr when either the software or packaging (or both) is not of > sufficient quality to make it into the official Fedora repo. I don't think of it as a endorsement. It is making them more easily discoverable but there is going to be a prompt of some sort that warns them of the nature of such software and users get to choose whether they are willing to accept that tradeoff for immediate access. One might choose to use say, Chromium regardless of the bundling issues for example. Rahul
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
