>>>>> "GH" == Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> writes:
GH> Makes sense to me, not only for texlive, stuff like perl pkgs from GH> cpan have pretty standard way to be built too. It's not just how the packages are built. There are also bundling and license issues which require manual inspection. The only reason for allowing texlive would be because it's already undergone a full license audit. Unless someone has done that for CPAN, I certainly wouldn't vote for a blanket exception if this came before FPC (which it probably wouldn't anyway, because this is more of a FESCo issue). - J< -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
