On 04/09/2015 02:37 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Thursday, April 09, 2015 12:07:55 PM Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> On 04/08/2015 06:41 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>> the docker base image is part of the Base WG. so it seems wrong to put it >>> on the Cloud page, but we should do something to advertise it more. >> >> But there's no Base WG page or anything... I know it's sitting there >> now, but I don't think end users care about which working group does it. >> >> Conceptually, it seems to me to fit with Cloud. Other suggestions welcome. >> >> I'm also curious whether there should be some closer collaboration >> between base wg and cloud on the container image(s)? > > there probably should be closer collaboration, it started under the cloud WG > and was moved to the Base WG. I do not really mind where it sits, but it > should not go flip flopping.
OK. And apologies for contributing to that, but we're all still figuring things out there. I suppose the best answer for now is to ride out the F22 release as-is and see about changing for F23 and forward? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst j...@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
