On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:09 AM, Jaroslav Skarvada <jskar...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> On 01.04.2015 10:29, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>> >>> pm-hibernate is obsolete as others already mentioned.
>> >>
>> >> Do the pm-utils maintainers/upstream know this?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I am pm-utils maintainer. I own some other "legacy" packages and
>> > I am retiring them only if there are good reasons for it
>> > (e.g. unfixed security bugs, breakage, etc.), because there may
>> > be still users using such packages / depending on their functionality.
>> >
>> > Regarding pm-utils, most of the functionality is currently handled
>> > by systemd. If there is anybody still using it, I think it shouldn't be
>> > hard to migrate. Also I think this package may be quite confusing
>> > for newcomers. Upstream said it's dead, so there are probably
>> > good reasons to retire. But currently there are the following
>> > packages in rawhide depending on pm-utils:
>> >
>> > cdm
>> > kdebase3
>>
>>
>> Same as with the 'cdm'.
>>
>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/kdebase3.git/commit/?id=2221c4
>> +
>> kdebase3.spec
>> Patch26: kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch
>> %define _with_suspend 1
>> %{?_with_suspend:%patch26 -p1 -b .suspend}
>>
>> ---
>>  kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch b/kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch
>> index 0462543..e1a5d0a 100644
>> --- a/kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch
>> +++ b/kdebase-3.5.5-suspend.patch
>> @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@
>>  +void KSMShutdownDlg::slotSuspend()
>>  +{
>>  +    switch ( suspendType ) {
>> -+       case SUSPEND_TYPE_HIBERNATE: system("/usr/bin/pm-hibernate"); break;
>> -+       case SUSPEND_TYPE_STANDBY: system("/usr/bin/pm-suspend"); break;
>> ++       case SUSPEND_TYPE_HIBERNATE: system("/usr/bin/systemctl hibernate");
>> break;
>> ++       case SUSPEND_TYPE_STANDBY: system("/usr/bin/systemctl suspend");
>> break;
>>  +    }
>>  +    reject();
>>  +}
>>
>> ...
>>
>> > I will drop pm-utils when resolved
>> >
>> > regards
>> >
>> > Jaroslav
>> >
>>
>> And that's it.
>> - cdm DONE
>> - kdebase3 DONE
>> - wicd DONE
>> - pm-utils DONE
>>
>>
>>
>
> Thanks,
>
> retired in master

Is that good enough?  Should systemd obsolete it, too?  I thought the
whole point of this thread was that pm-utils was actively dangerous
now, so shouldn't we actively remove it from users' systems?

--Andy
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to