Excerpts from paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade's message of 2015-07-27 00:05 +10:00: > Should I make the doc packages arch specific?
Rather than trying to make Sphinx spit out bitwise-identical output on every arch (which sounds like fighting a losing battle), could you just build the doc subpackage on only one arch? %ifarch x86_64 %package doc BuildArch: noarch ... %endif I think Koji still counts this a regular noarch subpackage and it should therefore be included in the Fedora trees for all arches. -- Dan Callaghan <dcall...@redhat.com> Senior Software Engineer, Products & Technologies Operations Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
