Dne 20.8.2015 v 13:42 Michael Schwendt napsal(a): > Your script output does not tell anything at all about activity of all > packagers in the package collection, in the normal review queue(s), in > pkgdb. No clues about number of orphaned/retired packages. No clues about > semi-dead packages where the packager is absent for a long time, and the > package only gets rebuilt during mass-rebuilds or receives random rebuilds > by other people.
This is completely different sets of problems. > How many new packagers manage to include a single package in the collection, > but lose interest in maintainership afterwards? How many fellow packagers > lose interest in Fedora in general and switch to another distribution? Again. Completely different sets of problems. I am trying to focus on "How to find sponsor for new contributor in reasonable time". > More interesting would be a discussion about which various fields of interest > the current sponsors cover. Ruby? MinGW? OLPC XS? Mono? Fonts? > Scientific/Maths > related school/research projects software? To mention a few fields only. This is actually good idea. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
