On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Martin Stransky <stran...@redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks for the info. Actually is there any reason why Fedora packager would > need to modify the original extension?
That depends on the extension and its particulars. For example, adblock plus has an extortion-like scheme in place and it allows certain ads from certain companies that have paid them good money for their service. This patch blocks those ads as well: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mozilla-adblockplus.git/tree/disable-safeads.patch I didn't care to check if such a modification is permitted by their TOS. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
