2015-09-11 21:09 GMT+02:00 Josh Stone <jist...@redhat.com>: > On 09/11/2015 10:35 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Actually, the opposite is true. RHEL has fewer limitations in this >> space. Red Hat's layered projects ship a fair amount of bundled stuff. >> This problem is entirely Fedora's. Fedora has far stricter rules than >> RHEL in this regard. > > It helps that we have paid maintainers for RHEL. Bundling is not as bad > when there's some assurance that it won't stagnate. But in general with > unpaid community members, it's harder to be sure things will be actively > maintained.
Keyword is *some*, there are packages in RHEL that are less maintained than they are in Fedora. I'd rather insist that RHEL has a smaller set of packages that makes it easier that most of them are better curated. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
