На 17.09.2015 в 06:28, Jerry James написа:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Alexander Todorov <atodo...@redhat.com> wrote:
Please let me know which packages need to genuinely be excluded and what
should we do with these packages ? Some will probably be fixed once they are
rebuilt but that may take a while.
Some language environments provide their own memory managers that
don't take kindly to address randomization, such as:
- gcl
- polyml
- xemacs
Hi Jerry,
how about other offenses like "No PIE" or "No canary found" ?
xemacs and polyml appear to have files with both good and bad values.
--
Alex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
