On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Marcin Zajączkowski <msz...@wp.pl> wrote:
> Thanks for your responses, guys! > > On 2015-10-18 16:57, Christopher wrote: > > To support this, I try to keep a mirror in GitHub for my packages... But > > it's hard to stay in sync sometimes and nobody really knows it's there. > > It'd be nice if this were supported directly, perhaps by automatically > > mirroring all packages in GitHub, like the ASF does, and emailing > > maintainers when activity occurs. > > I like the idea with mirroring Fedora Git to GitHub. Read only mirror > just to be a dedicated place for that kind of contributions (via pull > requests). GitHub is currently probably the most popular Git hosted > repositories provider. Maintainers could subscribe to their project on > GitHub to get notifications about the new PRs (or it could be done > automatically if GitHub login is associated with FAS). > > There could be optionally a support in fedpkg for merging that PRs > easily (or just an Git alias to do it - with one precised repo location > it would not be a problem). > > Automatic mirroring could be probably done automatically by GitHub. > Things like GitHub account association in FAS or CLA verification > (https://github.com/google/guava/pull/2163#issuecomment-141642504) would > require some additional work. > > Nevertheless I agree with Kevin about dependence on GitHub in that > element of the workflow (although not the crucial one). Maybe GitHub > integration would not be so beneficial as probably most of the > contributions come from people already related to Fedora and it would be > better to have that interface in the internal Fedora infrastructure one > day. > > Marcin Perhaps GitLab might be more appealing, since it is a FOSS service and it could be brought in-house relatively easily? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
