On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:48:25AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 12:44:55 +0100 > Sandro Mani <manisan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 25.09.2015 23:46, Sandro Mani wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 25.09.2015 22:44, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > >> On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:40:16 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > > >> > > >> Well, then adding the i686 build to the mash x86_64 multilib > > >> compose whitelist > > >> cannot be avoided -- as it's needed to really fix #1068620. > > > Okay thanks - https://pagure.io/mash/issue/4. > > Been a couple of weeks, is pagure being actively used for tracking > > mash requests? > > yes. > > However: > > 1) There's some kind of big release releng is working on. > Something 23? It's taking up a lot of their time. ;) > > 2) I think there's a pagure issue here where PR's aren't notifying > people who can merge them. I didn't see any notice of this one... > Will try and file a ticket on that.
It warns people with direct commit rights but not people in groups having commits right, there is a ticket opened for this: https://pagure.io/pagure/issue/449 Pierre
pgpH3dLdRgk4g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
