On Nov 3, 2015 07:30, "Steve Dickson" <ste...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On 11/03/2015 06:59 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2015 04:32:47 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > > > >>> %triggerun -- nfs-utils < 1:1.3.1-4.0 > >>> # reset configuration files and running daemons > >>> if [ $1 -eq 2 ] ; then > >>> /bin/systemctl enable nfs-client.target >/dev/null 2>&1 || : > >>> /bin/systemctl restart nfs-config >/dev/null 2>&1 || : > >>> /bin/systemctl restart nfs-client.target >/dev/null 2>&1 || : > >>> fi > >> So the answer is... I have to remove the above trigger to get > >> the build to work... > >> > >> What policy has changed that we now have to remove triggers > >> got get builds to work??? That is not a good direction... IMHO! > > > > AFAIK, overlapping triggers have never worked before, because RPM would > > only fire a single trigger. It's g > What I don't understand is there the overlap? I have the following triggers: > > %triggerun -- nfs-utils < 1:1.2.4-2 > %triggerun -- nfs-utils < 1:1.3.1-4.0 > > where is the overlap? >
Trigger two is true over any release less than 1.2.4 so it over laps. To not overlap you need a > range > steved. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct