On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 17:28 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) said: 
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 04:00:41PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > 
> > > OK - so what's the clear and non-controversial definition of
> > > "modules
> > > like 'file', 'template' and 'copy'"? What do those modules share
> > > in
> > > common that we can define clearly and concisely and in a way
> > > there
> > > won't be any serious dispute over?
> > 
> > Maybe "packages needed to be able to to use and configure the
> > default
> > package manager". For example one might need to be able to adjust
> > the
> > dnf repo config to be able to actually install pkgs, if there is a
> > restrictive firewall for example and only local mirrors are
> > accessible
> > or a proxy has to be used.
> 
> I would say "packages needed to be able to install software and then
> do
> basic configuration of the system" - this would be:
> 
> - $package_manager
> - core modules from http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_system_mo
> dules.html
> - core modules from http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/list_of_files_mod
> ules.html

That seems viable, sure. +1. Would you like to add a comment in comps
and update the group with the appropriate packages, or shall I? Thanks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Reply via email to