On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 15:01:02 -0600 Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> wrote:
> To satisfy my curiosity, I grepped the convenient tarball of specfiles > (http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz) for lines > matching "(?<!%)%define" (%define but not %%define). To my surprise, > there were more than 1900 hits. > > Here's a complete (long) list. I don't think there's much point in > doing anything about the vast majority of these, but if you're in > cleaning up your packages then why not? Also, feel free to let me > know if any of these are false positives. (They may be due to > %define in the changelog or in a "comment", which is also something > that should be fixed.) And if you're using %define because you > actually need one of the peculiar behaviors it exhibits, please let > me know because I'd like to see an actual example of that. In perl-Module-Extract-VERSION I have this for provides filtering that works in EPEL < 7: # Filter bogus provide for perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker::_version) (prior to rpm 4.9) %global provfilt /bin/sh -c "%{__perl_provides} | grep -Fvx 'perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker::_version)'" %define __perl_provides %{provfilt} It's been there for a long time and it's quite common in perl module packages. I don't think this works with %global instead of %define. Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
