On Wed, 6 Jan 2016, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Chandan did contact him a while ago and I confirm that he did not
receive any answer.
Since maintainer is inactive for a while, I was thinking about doing
the update as provenpackager after a reasonable delay.
I think this whole thread is more something for the Nonresponsive Maintainer
Process than for the Change Process.
Sure, the fact that the package maintainer isn't active is something for
the Nonresponsive Maintainer Process.
This 'Change', though, is really about moving a package to a fork, which I
thought was something that deserved wider attention and community input.
Scott
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
