On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Bill Nottingham <nott...@splat.cc> wrote:
> As a rule, I try not to take legal licensing interpretations from a CTO > who's trying to sell me the thing they're talking about the licensing of. > > We certainly could send that interpretation of CDDL/GPL and the kernel to > the > legal team... but I'm not sure they'd agree with it. > Well, if Lawrence Livermore is doing it, and Canonical apparently plans to do it, it probably would be a good idea to get a determination from the legal team. I don't care one way or another, I use BTRFS - but we shouldn't be saying there are license issues if there aren't.
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
