On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:39:02 +0000
José Matos <jama...@fc.up.pt> wrote:

> On Friday, February 26, 2016 11:58:38 AM Dan Horák wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > seems there was a new build of armadillo in the last days that broke
> > at least gdal in F-22 and F-23
> > 
> > from  http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13135380
> > ...
> > DEBUG util.py:399:  Error: Package: gdal-libs-1.11.4-1.fc22.x86_64
> > (build) DEBUG util.py:399:             Requires: libarmadillo.so.5()
> > (64bit)
> > 
> > I see armadillo-6.500.5-1.fc22 in f22-override, so my question
> > whether the issue is being fixed. repoquery gives me
> > 
> > dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libarmadillo.so.5()(64bit)'
> > Last metadata expiration check performed 0:55:07 ago on Fri Feb 26
> > 11:01:53
> > 2016. armadillo-devel-0:5.600.2-1.fc22.x86_64
> > gdal-0:1.11.3-1.fc22.x86_64
> > gdal-0:1.11.4-1.fc22.x86_64
> > gdal-java-0:1.11.4-1.fc22.x86_64
> > gdal-libs-0:1.11.3-1.fc22.x86_64
> > gdal-libs-0:1.11.4-1.fc22.x86_64
> > gdal-perl-0:1.11.4-1.fc22.x86_64
> > mlpack-0:1.0.11-5.fc22.x86_64
> > mlpack-bin-0:1.0.11-5.fc22.x86_64
> > 
> > 
> >             Dan
> 
> I sent a message to the affected package owners last Friday.
> Initially I expected to do this faster but I the process had a delay.
> I have rebuild mlpack on Wednesday, mmseq yesterday and I am now
> rebuilding gdal (I started that before seeing this message).
> 
> I will submit an update as soon as the build finishes.

no problem then, thanks :-)


                Dan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to