On 21 April 2013 10:56, Matthew Brush <mbr...@codebrainz.ca> wrote: > On 13-04-20 05:48 PM, Lex Trotman wrote: > >> [...] >> >> I definitively agree that there's someone/a few people out there, in this >>> strange self-imposed situation that are mentioned above, but I'd bet good >>> money it's a such a small minority of Geany's users, possibly even less >>> than 1%, to be worth bending over backwards for. >>> >>> >> The real problem is none of us knows how many actual users there are in >> any >> particular system configuration. I am only going on my experience, which >> as a contractor at least includes a spread of companies. >> >> In the past its always been me introducing Geany, but recently I have been >> pleasantly surprised to find a few customers already using it on Red Hat. >> >> Hence my concern to keep support for at least the Red Hat version that is >> still in primary support. >> >> > But if they're your customers, given your deep familiarity with Geany's > source and your likely influence on installed versions of it, could you not > backport critical fixes and improvements of which there are very few or run > a release closer to the year in which their corporate OS vendor offers > support up to for other packages?
Well as I said, some have already installed it before I came along, that means that there are more that have Geany and are not my customers. They are the ones I'm talking about supporting. Cheers Lex > > Cheers, > Matthew Brush > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.geany.org > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/devel<https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel> >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
