On 15 May 2013 11:38, Colomban Wendling <lists....@herbesfolles.org> wrote:
> Le 14/05/2013 09:47, Lex Trotman a écrit : > > > > [...] > > > > > > Colomban, > > > > And while you are in symbols.c (or near there ?) > > Err, your request moves towards c.c… nice try ;) > > > in C++ symbols defined with "auto" do not show in the symbols pane, > > thats understandable > > Probably prevents the parser form understanding the declaration. At > least it would prevent me from understanding it :) > > > (will raise bug report so we fix it and other c++11isms one day), but > > annoyingly those symbols still get rubbish autocompletions when you > > type symbol-> or symbol. > > > > Where are those coming from if the symbol doesn't exist? > > That's probably because the (current) scope completion code is well, > maybe "idiotic" is the word. But actually I don't know much since I > don't get this code, maybe ask Nick (he was against me replacing it with > a maybe slower version of this that I did understand, so maybe he did > actually understand the current one). > > But anyway, I think it tries very hard to show something, and then will > show rubbish for unknown tags. > > And don't forget we don't parse local variables, which means we have no > idea what their type is. > True, which does make it a little bit silly to try to return something for . and -> Cheers Lex > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.geany.org > https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel