On 13-11-11 05:37 AM, Thomas Martitz wrote:
Am 10.11.2013 21:04, schrieb Matthew Brush:

Maybe it's something specific to that Gist, so I re-pasted it in a new
one:

https://gist.github.com/codebrainz/7403171



Impressive. Unfortunately only a tiny fraction of Geany's code can be
vala'fied like this, right?


So trivially, yes. There's a few other GObjects that would be nearly as easy (but frankly are some Geany's nicest code already :), but the rest of the code would actually require writing real logic and stuff into Vala. Although what I was driving at in general wasn't just "porting" Geany's code 1:1 into Vala but re-factoring/re-writing/re-organizing, and using Vala to do it (same as I've talked about before WRT GObject on the list/IRC), so it's not really super important how much code can be directly 1:1 ported or vala-fied like that, I just wanted to give a little taste of the LOC/complexity reductions we could expect with Vala :)

Cheers,
Matthew Brush


_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to