בתאריך ד', נוב 13, 2013 בשעה 12:46 PM, Lex Trotman
<ele...@gmail.com> כתב:
[...]
I'm *really really really* tired of this topic. This comes up every
now and then, with the same bulled points over and over and with no
outcome at all (we're still at 2.16 after a couple of discussions
even though nobody explicitly says we need to be at this specific
version).
Agree, AFAIK only one thing "needs" 2.16, and thats the nightly
builder (which runs 2.16 checks and the windows nightly) and the
windows release builder (whatever that is?) that includes it in the
bundles.
Note, the windows nightly builder web page actually says its built
against 2.14.7, does anyone know if thats right?
I sure isn't right.
You can to find GTK+ 3.6 and GTK+ 2.24.
I build myself GTK+ 2 and GTK+ 3 on Windows,
it possible.
Can't we just define a simple rule that's written out somewhere as
to which GTK+ version to support. I don't mean a specific version
number but a rule like "The one released X years/month ago" or "the
version shipped in (enterprise) distro ABC" or "re-evaluated in a
grand IRC meeting every Y month". This would mean implicit bumping
of the minimum (by accepting patches that bump the minimum while
observing the rule) as required. Then we don't have to have this
tiresome argument over and over.
I'd agree that a planned schedule based on a metric would be an
improvement. At least both developers and users would have some
certainty about things.
Cheers
Lex
Best regards.
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel