Le 08/11/2014 17:50, Colomban Wendling a écrit : > Le 08/11/2014 12:27, Jiří Techet a écrit : >> […] >> >> Good, if there's an agreement here, I can have a look at it. But I'll >> wait until some of my TM patches get merged. There are a bit too many >> of them floating around and I'm slightly getting lost in all of my >> branches. > > I'll try to merge the tm branch as soon as possible, just a few small > comments as you saw. > >> Another thing I have noticed is that it would be good to make >> sTagEntryInfo as close to ctags as possible - for instance, the >> "signature" member in Geany is called "argList" in ctags and >> "seekPosition" is unused and not present in ctags. > > Good idea indeed. I just gave it a look, and it should be pretty easy > but for our "varType" field (a string) v.s. CTags' "typeRef" (a pair of > strings of the form [kind, name]). […]
I did the easy removals/renames in https://github.com/b4n/geany/commits/ctags-tag-entry (that's on top of TM branch, but easy to change or pick up specific commits) to see how easy it'd be -- and this part was trivial. Cheers, Colomban _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
