On 20.12.2015 06:04, Lex Trotman wrote: > Sounds like a reasonable idea, but it triggered me to ask about > licenses and copyright. Imagine my feigned horror when I discovered > none of Geany's filetypes has a copyright notice or license for its > use. > > So I am claiming copyright and Enrico and Colomban, the invoice is in > the mail :) > > The wiki has a blanket "cc share alike" license notice in the footer, > so thats better than nothing, though with no copyright owners > identified just who is giving this license is questionable. But its > better than Geany. > > We need to make sure that the license is transferred to the new repo > as well, and then I think its a good idea.
We put the complete repo to GPL2+ and all PR automatic have that license. Cheers, Frank
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.geany.org https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
