Am 29.08.2016 um 14:23 schrieb Lex Trotman:
This adds per use case hooks to plugins, which then became part of the stable 
API. I don't think that we have to codify every single use case of tags into 
the plugins. That's just making it harder (maybe impossible?) to change or add 
use cases.
The point of this proposal is to change and add use-cases that are not
currently possible with the current plugin API.  But instead of each
use-case generating its own piece of API and its own infrastructure,
the point of the FT-plugins proposal is to provide a common
infrastructure and approach for all filetype specific use-cases, those
needed for currently suggested uses, indentation, clang based styling
and symbols, and as framework for future use-cases we either havn't
thought of, or havn't a concrete intention to add immediately.

I thought we agreed that plugin should simply provide tags to Geany/TM
This proposal is about many types of filetype specific functionality,
not just tags.  Tagmanager will not help in any way with indenting
Haskell, or even C++.



4 of 5 of the proposed features are strictly tag-related. And Geany can do all of them already, it's just that the current implementation leaves things to be desired so there is the idea to let plugins improve upon them.

I disagree with the proposed solution for those 4, because they are offloading logic on a per feature basis to plugins, only because Geany isn't capable at the moment. If Geany was capable, then there could be 1 solution for the 4 features and less complexity in each plugin (and we know the quality of plugins varies a lot so they should have little complexity as possible).

The solution I have in mind simply allows plugins to pass tags to Geany which they parsed with more advanced code. The tags itself would advanced too, to allow for the improvements current TM+ctags can't offer. Symbol tree, calltips, autocompletion, jump-to-decl can all be improved based on the advanced tags.

Best regards.
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.geany.org
https://lists.geany.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to