> > It isn't clear that making the popdown insensitive is the right > solution. Why should it appear at all if there is no sharing?
Interesting point. An arguable benefit (as long as it remains an option menu) is that it still clearly indicates that the activity is private. It's function as a label could still be valid. In general I agree, though. If there is NO way to make the control sensitive at all, then it seems it shouldn't even exist. Of course, there is some question as to whether or not we'll keep the menu anyway, or if we'll resort to a palette button (so that Sugar can render the resulting palette itself) in the future. - Eben -walter > > On 8/16/07, Zarro Boogs per Child <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > #2819: need way to make a non-sharable activity > > --------------------------+--------------------------------- > ---------------- > > Reporter: erikb | Owner: marco > > Type: enhancement | Status: closed > > Priority: normal | Milestone: Trial-3 > > Component: sugar | Version: Build 542 > > Resolution: fixed | Keywords: > > Verified: 0 | > > --------------------------+--------------------------------- > ---------------- > > Changes (by marco): > > > > * status: new => closed > > * resolution: => fixed > > > > Comment: > > > > Fixed. self.props.max_participants = 1 will make the popdown > insensitive. > > > > -- > > Ticket URL: <http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/2819#comment:5> > > One Laptop Per Child <http://laptop.org/> > > > > > > -- > Walter Bender > One Laptop per Child > http://laptop.org > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
