On Dec 15, 2007 10:26 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2007 3:54 PM, Bernardo Innocenti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Moreover, I was very confused by the fact that we branched Update.1
> > from Ship.2 rather than from Joyride, which I still considered our
> > development trunk. Until a few days ago, I've been working under
> > the assumption that all the work I had done in Joyride before
> > Dec 15 would implicitly show up in Update.1.
>
> Exactly. Can we get this right for Update.2? :)
I believe this has been a source of a lot of confusion, and one which
I keep running out of time to ensure we discuss at our Tuesday
meetings. I'm speaking for jg here, and I might be wrong, but my
understanding is that JG wanted to ensure he could keep tabs on
exactly what was changing between ship.2 and update.1, but that
update.1 will be (eventually) substantially the same as "joyride at
the time of code freeze". We'll pull a diff and make sure that if any
joyride-at-time-of-code-freeze package is *not* in update.1, we know
exactly why. We have had differences of opinion here, so I probably
shouldn't try to elaborate further.
--scott
--
( http://cscott.net/ )
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
