<quote who="Bert Freudenberg" date="Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:28:12PM +0100"> > However, why did you ask that question only after the build was made, > when the package was approved one week ago? There would have been > enough time to discuss it. > > And secondly, what *is* the current policy of package inclusion? I > was under the impression that getting approval from Jim/Kim/Walter > was enough. But now we have to convince you, too? What could be > possibly broken in the system by a new activity release? And who else > would be authoritative on whether that activity works as intended if > not its authors?
The library packages were in exactly the same situation -- approved with plenty of time but then silently not included. Both SJ and I were around to answer any questions or issues. Regards, Mako -- Benjamin Mako Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mako.cc/ Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results. --GNU Manifesto
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
