On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Charles Merriam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> April Fool's was a good way to present what does eventually need to be > done, and what is done in some other open source projects. > > It's a good way of doing it, and would require some work. I would set > up a set of stages with the highest and easiest pay-offs first, e.g. > building versions with and without activities and with and without > source would be easy. I don't know how to implement some of the > features, especially code coverage metrics. > > Does anyone believe OLPC Foundation is up to this style of change? > It is certainly worth discussing, which is why Scott added it to the schedule for tomorrow's discussion. If youa re free around 13:30 EST to present it yourself via the dialin number, that would be ideal; otherwise someone else will present for you (though perhaps not as passionately) and you can read the results in the minutes... SJ
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
