I owe everyone a beer/coffee when I get back to 1CC for troubling you with my senility.
wad On Apr 28, 2008, at 3:07 PM, John Watlington wrote: > RTFM. > > It looks like most of the problem was not deleting the boot > directory on the key. Why this worked for 3 of five laptops, > but not these last two, I don't know... > > On Apr 28, 2008, at 3:02 PM, C. Scott Ananian wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:53 PM, John Watlington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> When I reboot (after activating), it reports that the lease in >>> nand:\security\lease.sig is expired. >>> Then it finds valid signatures for the OS and proceeds. >> >> That's very interesting. Once you have a dev key, can you ask OFW >> what's actually in nand:\security\lease.sig? Does it look >> reasonable? >> It is writable? >> >> If you could also note the "mounting XYZ on /mnt options that are >> tried; the process should look like this: >> * try /dev/mmcblk0p1 (partitioned SD card) >> * /dev/mmcblk0 (unpartitioned SD card) >> * /dev/sdX for X in ['a1','a','b1','b','c1','c','b1','b','a1','a'] >> (we expect /dev/sda1 to work, so we try it again at the end in case >> the USB disk just took a while to be recognized) >> * wireless on channels 1, 6, 11, 1, 6, 11 >> >> If it doesn't make it all the way through this process, then what it >> likely happening is that it is successfully finding the lease and >> then >> failing to write it to NAND. So knowing how far it gets through this >> is useful. >> --scott >> >> -- >> ( http://cscott.net/ ) > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel