looks right as far as the alphanumerics go. 2008/5/6 Kim Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> We're looking for some help on the Turkey keyboard layout. Attached is an > image of the 'Q' layout for Turkey. Can anyone verify the details of this > layout? > > Bernie, Arjun, > Can either of you create this alternate Turkey keyboard wiki page and help > figure out what needs to be done for SW support? > > Thanks, > Kim > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Edward Cherlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> 2008/4/21 Kim Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > Thanks Walter, >> > Does this mean you have approved Uzbec, Pashto, French Canadian, and >> Kazakh? >> >> We don't have localization projects for Uzbek or Kazakh. Should we start >> them? >> >> Looking at the table, I also see Armenian, for which there is no >> localization. Should we start it? >> >> Also, the table specifies a Russian Cyrillic keyboard for Ukrainian, >> which is a serious error. >> >> "Note that many langauge/region variants can share a common keyboard, >> e.g., Russian (ru_RU) and Ukrainian (uk_UA) both use the Cyrillic >> keyboard, but will need different SKUs to accommodate the different >> language settings on the laptop." >> >> Not so. Ukrainian requires the letters >> >> Ї U+0407 >> ї U+0457 >> Ґ U+0490 >> ґ U+0491 >> >> which don't occur in Russian. See the ua keyboard file. >> >> > I am aware of the need for final approval of Italian, Khmer, and Nepali. >> > Quanta is sending these keyboards to OLPC this week. >> > >> > In the past when Quanta sends a first article for approval, do we need >> to >> > match that up against the design from the wiki page? Or do you recommend >> > some other step(s) for final approval? >> >> How about consulting with national standards bodies and Unicode? I can >> put you in touch with people who know way more about these issues than >> anybody here. >> >> > Thanks, >> > Kim >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Walter Bender < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >> > > Actually, I don't recall ever approving a Turkish keyboard... The rest >> > > of the table seems up to date as far as I know. I had been in close >> > > contact with several groups in Turkey about 12 months ago and at the >> > > time, they were advocating the F layout. It would certainly be easy >> > > enough to do a Q layout. >> > > >> > > -walter >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Kim Quirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > Walter, >> > > > Can you provide the state of the keyboards that have no note in the >> > table: >> > > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Mfg-data >> > > > >> > > > I have been assuming that this is the table that is most up to date. >> If >> > > > there is no note in saying 'not yet approved', does that mean they >> have >> > been >> > > > through the entire approval cycle? Did you get a physical sample of >> each >> > of >> > > > these? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Kim >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Bernie Innocenti < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > [Sorry for this flood of Turkish related topics. It's only >> > > > > because I'm working from Turkey -- Captain Obvious] >> > > > > >> > > > > There seem to be two different keyboard layouts for Tukey, >> > > > > the F layout and the Q layout, named after the leftmost key >> > > > > of the top row. >> > > > > >> > > > > >From our wiki and our X11 keyboard file, we seem to have >> > > > > picked the F layout: >> > > > > >> > > > > http://wiki.laptop.org/go/OLPC_Turkey_Keyboard >> > > > > >> > > > > But here everybody is telling me that the Q layout is the most >> > > > > widely used and the favorite. All the computers I see around >> > > > > me use this layout. >> > > > > >> > > > > Are we still in time to change the this in production? >> > > > > >> > > > > This seems to be yet another case where a country-specific >> > > > > build would be absolutely required, regardless of our planned >> > > > > release cycle. Obviously we'll get more and more of these >> > > > > cases as we deploy to a wider range of countries. So this >> > > > > seems like a good time to discuss how to have per-country >> > > > > builds released in parallel with ease. >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > \___/ >> > > > > |___| Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ >> > > > > \___\ CTO OLPC Europe - http://www.laptop.org/ >> > > > > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > Devel mailing list >> > > > > Devel@lists.laptop.org >> > > > > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Devel mailing list >> > Devel@lists.laptop.org >> > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Edward Cherlin >> End Poverty at a Profit by teaching children business >> http://www.EarthTreasury.org/ >> "The best way to predict the future is to invent it."--Alan Kay >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel