In total agreement, etc, here my 2 ¢ To avoid a "plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose*" kind of moment, could we have the naming of such an ombudsman be an open affair, not something done behind doors?
To begin with, could we pinpoint _what_ we are looking in such a person? 1.- obsessive openness, not subject to OLPC NDA 2.- reasonable knowledge of OLPC, known by and knows the actors / goings on 3.- (please add on, edit, maybe wiki this thing?) ..... *(more of the same) Paul Fox wrote: > c. scott ananian wrote: > > On 5/22/08, Todd Cranston-Cuebas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i think your earlier proposal for establishing a liaison/ambassador > role was spot on -- that role of evangelism and outreach was > missing throughout G1G1, and is still missing today > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
