c. scott ananian wrote: > On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Before we can ship power management, though, we should also fix: > > * the SD corruption bug (#6532) -- if we can't fix it in time, we can > > inhibit suspend when an SD card is plugged in. > > * pushing wakeup decisions to the EC (#6010) -- this will make the > > wakeup logic more reliable. > > I'd claim that #6532 is not a *blocker*, it is just a desired feature. > I think that we should ship low-power mode in 8.2 even if that means > we grey out the option to turn it on when an sd card is mounted.
if we can guarantee that we won't corrupt user data, then i agree that it's not a blocker. but if not, i'd say it is. > #6010 I'm a little more ambivalent on; I'd need more opinions on > whether wakeup is unreliable "enough" to make an explicit low-power > mode unworkable. If it means that sometimes it takes two power button > presses to wake up, that's probably not a blocker. If it is so hard > to wake up that people regularly think the machine is hung and > hard-power-off instead, that's probably a blocker. is there background missing from trac? i don't read anything in #6010 other than "we wake up only to go right back to sleep too often", which seems even more benign (leaving power usage aside) than you're describing. paul =--------------------- paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
