On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 05:01 -0400, Greg Smith wrote: > description? > > It would be useful to see a comparison of build 656 v 703 v 708 v > latest > joyride. That's a lot so just 703 (last release image) vs latest > Joyride > would the top priority. I'm not instrumenting the code but using a stopwatch so timings are a bit rough.
The test: - reboot the machine - wait that jfss2_gcd_mtd0 finishes hogging the cpu (around 50 secs from when the shell is displayed) - go to the listview (*) - for every activity (one at time), from the drop menu->start and take the time until the full window redrawn - do it again from point (*) if you want to see the difference between first startup and 'warm' startup I also use to gather stats with Picker while doing the test, to see what processes are taking more cpu time; it also helps to catch conditions where activities are fully redrawn at time x but really are fully loaded at x+20sec (easy to see in etoys and browse). Are both first and second launch timings needed ? > Michael, > > What is the latest version of Joyride that people should be testing? > > I re-read your status e-mail July 12 and didn't see it in there: > http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-July/016457.html > > I didn't click on all the links so let me know if I missed it > somewhere. > thanks, riccardo _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel