Bobby Powers wrote: >> I don't have numbers for these efficiencies. The EC code has comments >> with magical constants that suggest certain numbers for these values but >> I've learned that a lot of those comments may be wrong or apply to >> earlier versions of the batteries. The range suggested is 80 - 90%. > > would (somehow) updating these magical constants for current batteries > (depending on LiFe or NiCad chemistries) improve anything?
What I mean is that the "comments" may not be correct so if it says the charge efficiency in CC mode is 90% I can't be sure that its really 90% without setting up my own testing and verifying. The magic constants may have been adjusted for a battery thats really 87% without updating the comments to match. -- Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> One Laptop Per Child _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel