On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 14:16 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> swfdec{,-mozilla} use gstreamer, are LGPLed, and support most of the
> Flash 9 features whereas gnash supports only a few of the Flash 9
> features. swfdec is also the default Flash player on Fedora, and is
> the preferred flash player on Ubuntu.Quick clarification. We discussed making swfdec installed by default during the development of Fedora 9, but decided against doing so since we felt it wasn't quite ready for that. > Were there some specific problems with using swfdec? Or was it not > under consideration due to some factors? I'm not sure if it was considered, but as the maintainer of swfdec in Fedora I can state that swfdec is very cpu-intensive, and I have my doubts whether the performance on the XO would be comparable to gnash's, though it might be worth investigating. Later, /B -- Brian Pepple <bpep...@fedoraproject.org> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
