On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:08 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > For the evince vs sugar-evince I suspect we need to try and get the >>> > mainline evince split out into evince and evince-libs so that we >>> > can build sugar-evince against it similar to what we do with >>> > abiword and write (I think that's its name). >>> >>> Yep, sounds good. >> >> When I get a sec I'll look at what's required and file a RH bug for >> evince to see if we can't get the package split up. > > BTW where does the current sugar-evince srpm live?
In koji. Here is the diff against the corresponding evince version: http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=users/dsd/sugar-evince;a=commitdiff;h=d9b354a9318b6a99fa7ae185495b94431ab142c9 There are some changes to the core evince source which means that it will be more than just splitting up the F10 evince package. But that will certainly be a step in the right direction. Daniel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel