Speaking of android, has anyone heard anything about google's other OS, chrome OS?
kind regards, David On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Samuel Klein <meta...@gmail.com> wrote: > NoiseEHC, I think your arguments would be more convincing if you > didn't respond to every email, especially when you'd made that point > before in the same thread :-) > > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:40 AM, NoiseEHC <noise...@freemail.hu> wrote: > > >> The software is designed for learning. *That* is what Sugar was created > for, which is not at all what Android was created for, as you claimed when > starting this discussion. > >> > > > > Another Straw Man argument. What I said was "Android OS solves exactly > > the same *problems* Sugar has been created to solve". You know while you > > have noticed correctly that Android was created to be a phone OS and > > Sugar was created to be a learning OS (not too that hard to notice > > though), they had almost the same *problems* to solve. Because they had > > different goals they did not solve exactly the same problem set (it was > > an exaggeration in my sentence) but close (self hosting dev tools and > > local communication are the main differences). > > That said, I find Noise's line of reasoning here compelling. What > are specific features of the current Sugar experience that people > think would be hard to port to Android [porting Etoys might in fact be > hard]? > > SJ > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > -- Mike Ditka <http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mike_ditka.html> - "If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have given us arms."
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel