Doubtless it would be painful... but... openjdk _is_ open source.
Jython? On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:21 AM, rihowa...@gmail.com <rihowa...@gmail.com>wrote: > You are correct. Android development is Java based. It is based on a > subset of Java functionality with the android API built on top of that. > > If you want a QT based environment look at Meego > http://meego.com/developers. > > > On May 28, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Putting some kittens at risk, it would be useful to have some analysis > of > >> both the work involved and potential benefits to an Android port, a Qt > port, > >> etc. I am not suggesting we divert our current efforts, as we are quite > >> lean, but a better understanding of these options would be useful in > >> defining our future roadmaps. > > > > Isn't Android application development Java based? > > > > Peter > > _______________________________________________ > > Devel mailing list > > Devel@lists.laptop.org > > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel >
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
