Jacob - The Linux kernel question is easy, as it's largely GPL v2; the Fedora one is by no means easy. The Fedora Project maintains a list of software licenses which are considered acceptable for software to be packaged in Fedora. That doesn't mean *all* these licenses are in use in any particular Fedora release, but it does give you a sense of the possibilities. You can find the list, with all 206 "good" software license possibilities (26 of which are GPL variations) at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses - as well as the acceptable documentation licenses.
It's a fine list, but the 49th license listed stands out from a crowded pack, and rewards the modest effort required to count up to 49. - Ed On Jul 7, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > >> forgive an honest question that may spark a philosophical debate: >> Since the Linux kernel and Fedora are both licensed under GPL.2, >> how would this violate an unrelated license? (which reading, it >> may or may not...) > > Because it's not true that "Fedora" is licensed under GPLv2 -- > it's licensed under a mix of licenses, including some GPLv3. > > - Chris. > -- > Chris Ball <c...@laptop.org> > One Laptop Per Child > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.laptop.org > http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel