On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 13:21 -0500, Rafael Ortiz wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Paul Fox <p...@laptop.org> wrote: > jerry wrote: > > Hi all: > > > > Playing around with wedo, I've found that scratch is > providing udev > > rules for wedo and there are rules installed by olpc-utils. > I'm > > wondering if the rules provided by scratch should be used > in place of or > > in conjunction with the olpc provided rules > in /etc/udev/rules.d. Here > > are the contents of the 2 files for F11. > > > > 30-olpc-wedo.rules: > > # Lego WeDo > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0003", > GROUP="dialout", > > MODE="0660" > > > > 45-lego-wedo.rules: > > # Lego WeDo > > SYSFS{idVendor}=="0694", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0003", > MODE="0666" > > > > Looks to me that what is provided by scratch should be part > of > > olpc-utils. > > > i believe scratch supplies rules because (at least at the > time) it > could be installed on XO distributions that didn't include > udev > rules at all. > > This is my impresion too, last versions of scratch included these > rules. > Ok, then I'll assume those are included to allow scratch to work on something other than an olpc build.
> > and since the 'olpc' user is a member of group 'dialout', i > think these > rules are equivalent in practice. (except for use by 'other', > and i'm not sure how that would happen on an XO.) both rules > give the olpc user read/write access to the device. > > are you seeing a conflict or other problem? > I don't have a wedo kit yet to test with, I'm just trying to preempt any issues. Jerry _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel