> roughly speaking, we chose the "dialout" group because a) it's a > traditional group for access to UNIX serial devices, b) many USB > devices that activities need access to are actually serial devices, > and c) the "olpc" user is already a member of "dialout". is it > important that Lego devices be protected by a separate group > membership? No.. was only a idea... Seeing the Wiki appears this: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Robots/udev_rules
In the article: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/11.2.0/Robotics_plan Can be add USB4all in the list? http://wiki.laptop.org/go/11.2.0/Robotics_plan#Dev_and_test_matrix > the current udev rule isn't added by Sugar -- it's in the olpc-utils > rpm distributed by OLPC. we can add a modified rule once we agree > on what it should look like. +1
_______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel