--- On Mon, 5/28/12, Martin Langhoff <martin.langh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmmmm. Sorry, I disagree here. You have usage cases, and > they are very > different from each other. There isn't much "normal". I would agree with this. The original test although intended for other things, suggested that the ARM CPU (a major difference in the XO-1.75) is significant more efficient (output/watt) but also less capable (output/time) than the x86 of the XO-1.5. I have the sense that both of these are generally accepted as trends but the extend of "gains and losses" is not quite clear. I would be happy to try other recommended tests that may be more representative/appropriate to better quantify CPU performance and efficiency differences. In the mean time I'll wrestle with lmbench and see what comes out. _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
