> > > > Most of the test had empty values but the > informative ones (below) show > >> that the XO-1.5 is better in basic integer > operations and memory bandwidth > >> while the XO-1.75 is better in float and double > operations as well as in > >> memory latency. > >> I'm not sure how much this means for real life > usage :-/ > >> > > > > I'm very suspect of this measurement. The 1.5 has > a hardware floating > > point unit and the 1.75 is still using > soft-float. Its extremely unlikely > > that the floating point performance on 1.75 is better > than the 1.5. > > > > Hard FP status depends on if Yioryos is running 11.3.1 or > 12.1.0. Since he > said "os10" by today's date I'm presuming 12.1.0. > > The Fedora 17 builds should be hard fp (armv7hl). The > Fedora 14-based > 11.3.1 builds are not (armv5tel / armv7l kernel).
Correct. For the LMbench test the XO-1.75 was funning F17/21012o2 with the correct kernel per dsd's suggestion ( http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2012-May/035212.html ) The XO-1.5 was running F14/11.3.0 os880 _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel