----- Original Message ----- > From: James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> > To: Yioryos Asprobounitis <mavrot...@yahoo.com> > Cc: OLPC Devel <devel@lists.laptop.org> > Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2013 2:10 AM > Subject: Re: XO-1(.75) > > On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 02:21:08PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote: >> I'm using the XO-1.75 a bit more these days and gives me a sense of >> XO-1 performance wise. So I compared my (500/200 overclocked) XO-1 >> running F14/os885/Sugar-0.94 to XO-1.75 running >> F-18/13.2.0-11/Sugar-0.98. > > Since some general performance work was done between those software > versions, the comparison is uninteresting. Compare 13.2.0-11 across > XO-1 and XO-1.75, or compare XO-1 across os885 and 13.2.0-11, > depending on what you are looking to prove.
This comparison has been done a couple of months ago and is clear that F18/S0.98 taxes the systems considerably. What I found interesting in this "unmatched" comparison was the inconsistency. They might point to specific stacks in the architecture and/or core OS that may need attention (I originally thought was that activities with an extended non-python component or proportionally less gtk3, fair better on the XO-1.75 - but what do I know ;). Anyway, if the knowledgeable believe there is nothing to it or anything to be done about it,' there goes the comparison. > > -- > James Cameron > http://quozl.linux.org.au/ > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel