On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 October 2013 23:39, James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> wrote: >> >> I agree with Samuel; that with the loss of public review of patches >> participation in development has been confined to those who take the >> trouble to visit a web site. >> >> (The reviews by mail were also stimulating other discussion on list). >> >> So on the theory that developers are developing with less review (even >> though it might be unseen greater review), this leads to the >> conclusion that Sugar is being developed by these developers "on their >> own". > > > Well "everyone seems to be developing their own version of Sugar" seems to > be more than that. But maybe I'm just reading too much into it.
I am only aware of one group "developing their own version of Sugar": Activity Central. There is the Sugar Network project as well, but that is more about glue around Sugar. Gonzalo and I are working with Sugar upstream in Australia (although we are ahead of master in a few places as Sugar 100 has been in freeze). > > There aren't multiple groups of people or individuals developing sugar on > their own. As far as I know all the work that is being done these days is > going upstream. > regards. -walter -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel