On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 08:02:22PM +0200, Daniel Narvaez wrote: > things are looking good so far, we already have all the models > booting into sugar 0.101 with wif apparentlyi working.
I agree, well done. Why is it everybody named Daniel does development so fast? ;-) > * Should we contribute the olpc-os-builder changes back to OLPC or > fork it? I don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the > linux side of things, if not maybe better to turn this into a > sugarlabs thing. Contribute, please. In whatever way is best for you and your users; (a) patches by mail, (b) fork and pull requests, (c) an account on dev.laptop.org. I also don't know if OLPC will do any active development on the Linux side of things. It is more likely now than yesterday, because FZT's new requirements may cascade into work by OLPC. > * Are interested deployments using olpc-update? If I'm not mistake > AU is not. UY is not. It is very useful feature though, small changes possible without reinstalling every laptop. -- Also, I agree with Jon Nettleton, while there is substantial risk continuing with Fedora, with reduced opportunity, there are greater opportunities with other distributions. However, the deployments are an installed base, and may not be interested in switching at this time, unless a compelling reason exists. So by all means, look for compelling reasons and ways to reduce development effort. Meanwhile, work with Fedora specialists. -- In past 24 hours the activity caused 14 unsubscribe on devel@, with 699 remaining. Good sign. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel