I don't care one way or the other how you guys configure
olpc-os-builder, but as a Sugar platform contributor, I think "sugar"
packages should come with all the bells and whistles included, and if
any deployment wants to chop and censor functionality, then it should
be their problem, not the other way around.
Regards,
Sebastian
El mar, 2 de sep 2014 a las 10:01 AM, Gonzalo Odiard
<godi...@sugarlabs.org> escribió:
Gonzalo's question seems to suggest that the dependency on
sugar-cp-background should be declared by the sugar package spec
file.
I disagree. I think it should be a decision by deployment team.
Yes. That is the reason I asked.
Anyway, no problem from my part if the rpm is added by default in
kspkglist.50.sugar.inc
Gonzalo
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
