From: James Cameron <qu...@laptop.org> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 13:20:20 +1100 > ... libc.so.6 is a symbolic link, not a file.
Thanks. > But on 13.2.1 it might instead look in: > > /usr/lib/ OK! An expedient solution is now the last or near last submission here. http://www.ocp.inf.ethz.ch/forum/index.php/topic,918.0.html Essentially, "sudo ln -s /lib /lib/i386-linux-gnu". The body of /usr/aos/source/Linux.I386.Unix.Mod has libraryPaths[0] := "/lib/i386-linux-gnu"; libraryPaths[1] := "/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu"; These paths are mentioned here, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MultiarchSpec#Filesystem_layout but not in any of these. http://www.linuxbase.org/betaspecs/fhs/fhs.html https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html http://www.gnu.org/software/gnustep/resources/documentation/User/GNUstep/filesystem.html */lib/i386* appears to be an emerging multiarch thing. > Meanwhile, get it packaged for Fedora to alleviate future pain? Adoption of multiarch in Fedora seems possible. If that happens, the i386-linux-gnu paths are likely to appear in the stock file system. In the interim, the installation procedure for UnixAos is straightforward, http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~fld/UnixAos/Readme.txt and "sudo ln -s /lib /lib/i386-linux-gnu" is just one extra step. Also UnixAos is a moving target. A package for Fedora or Debian would need an update several times in a year. Unless there is a very strong justification, I'm reluctant to extend my "unfinished projects" list. Regards, ... Peter E. -- 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12 Tel +1 360 639 0202 http://carnot.yi.org/ Bcc: peter at easthope. ca _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel