Since we consider the failure of parsing the backing store to be
actually success based on the value we return to the caller, we should
continue parsing also features and the 'compat' field so that we don't
have a partial definition if e.g. the backing store format is not known.

Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <[email protected]>
---
 src/storage_file/storage_file_probe.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/storage_file/storage_file_probe.c 
b/src/storage_file/storage_file_probe.c
index c73f533d2d..4cf052c03d 100644
--- a/src/storage_file/storage_file_probe.c
+++ b/src/storage_file/storage_file_probe.c
@@ -955,13 +955,9 @@ virStorageFileProbeGetMetadata(virStorageSource *meta,

     VIR_FREE(meta->backingStoreRaw);
     if (fileTypeInfo[meta->format].getBackingStore != NULL) {
-        int store = 
fileTypeInfo[meta->format].getBackingStore(&meta->backingStoreRaw,
-                                                               &format,
-                                                               buf, len);
+        fileTypeInfo[meta->format].getBackingStore(&meta->backingStoreRaw,
+                                                   &format, buf, len);
         meta->backingStoreRawFormat = format;
-
-        if (store == BACKING_STORE_INVALID)
-            return 0;
     }

     g_clear_pointer(&meta->features, virBitmapFree);
-- 
2.42.0
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to