Current implementation of virDomainMemoryDefCheckConflict() does only a one way comparison, i.e. if there's a memory device within def->mems[] which address falls in [mem->address, mem->address + mem->size] range (mem is basically an iterator within def->mems[]). And for static XML this works just fine. Problem is with hot/cold plugging of a memory device. Then mem points to freshly parsed memory device and these half checks are insufficient. Not only we must check whether an existing memory device doesn't clash with freshly parsed memory device, but also whether freshly parsed memory device does not fall into range of already existing memory device.
Resolves: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-4452 Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com> --- src/conf/domain_validate.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/conf/domain_validate.c b/src/conf/domain_validate.c index d485ec4fb1..14148a18d3 100644 --- a/src/conf/domain_validate.c +++ b/src/conf/domain_validate.c @@ -2264,6 +2264,7 @@ virDomainMemoryDefCheckConflict(const virDomainMemoryDef *mem, for (i = 0; i < def->nmems; i++) { const virDomainMemoryDef *other = def->mems[i]; unsigned long long otherStart = 0; + unsigned long long otherEnd = 0; if (other == mem) continue; @@ -2315,7 +2316,10 @@ virDomainMemoryDefCheckConflict(const virDomainMemoryDef *mem, if (thisStart == 0 || otherStart == 0) continue; - if (thisStart <= otherStart && thisEnd > otherStart) { + otherEnd = otherStart + other->size; + + if ((thisStart <= otherStart && thisEnd > otherStart) || + (otherStart <= thisStart && otherEnd > thisStart)) { virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, _("memory device address [0x%1$llx:0x%2$llx] overlaps with other memory device (0x%3$llx)"), thisStart, thisEnd, otherStart); -- 2.43.0 _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list -- devel@lists.libvirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.libvirt.org
